A British Columbia–based development firm has confirmed that a planned sale of a large industrial property in Virginia to a U.S. federal agency will no longer move forward. The warehouse, located in Ashland, Virginia, had been under contract with a U.S. government contractor linked to the Department of Homeland Security, which intended to convert the site into a processing facility. However, the company stated that the transaction will not be completed.

The 550,000-square-foot warehouse had drawn intense scrutiny from local residents and advocacy groups after details emerged about its potential use. Government officials in Hanover County and members of the community expressed strong opposition to the plan, which was set against a backdrop of broader controversy over immigration enforcement policies in the United States. Protests and public letters urging the developer to reconsider the agreement were part of the reaction as the story unfolded.

In its brief announcement, the development arm of the Vancouver-based business said simply that the sale “will not be proceeding.” Representatives did not elaborate on the specific reasons beyond the cancellation, noting only that the transaction had been subject to customary conditions and approvals before termination. As a private transaction, the company typically would not comment, but highlighted its awareness of the broader conversations surrounding the proposed use of the property.

Also Read: Long term investing in Canada

The decision sparked mixed response. Some local and national advocacy voices hailed the reversal as a response to community pressure and a reflection of corporate responsiveness to public concern. Others questioned whether the withdrawal was initiated as a principled position or simply a response to reputational and financial risk. Debate over the motivations behind the cancellation continues among commentators and stakeholders.

Also Read: Top Canadian tech AI stocks

The property’s future remains uncertain, and neither the company nor U.S. federal agencies have outlined alternative plans. For now, the warehouse remains under the ownership of the development firm, and any future disposition will likely draw further attention given the public reaction to the initial proposal.